John
Quincy ADAMS on U.S. foreign policy"[America]
goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher
to the freedom and
independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. She
will commend the general cause by the countenance of her voice, and the
benignant sympathy of her example. She well knows that by once enlisting under
other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence,
she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of
interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume
the colors and usurp the standard of freedom."
-- John Quincy Adams, Speech before the House of Representatives, July 4, 1821;
quoted in William Bonner and Pierre Lemieux (Editors), The Idea of America (Les Belles Lettres, 2003), p. 237.
"All and everybody, this is
my claim, fifty feet on the gulch, cordin to Clear Creek District Law, backed
up by shotgun amendments."
-- Quoted in John Umbeck, "Might Makes Rights: A Theory of the Formation
and Initial Distribution of Property Rights", Economic Inquiry, Vol. 19 (January 1981), p. 50; from C. Shinn, Land
Laws of Mining Districts (John Hopkins
University Press, 1984), p. 558.
"And, lastly, to vindicate
these rights, when actually violated and attacked, the subjects of England are
entitled, in the first place, to the regular administration and free course of
justice in the courts of law; next to the right of petitioning the king and
parliament for redress of grievances; and, lastly, to the right of having and
using arms for self preservation and defense."
-- Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Clarendon Press: Oxford, 17th edition, 1966, Vol.
1., Chap.1).
"Les armes à feu, celles
d'épaule plus spécifiquement, ont acquis une certaine noblesse dans l'histoire
canadienne, car elles ont assuré, sans conteste, la poursuite de l'exploitation
et de la mise en valeur d'un territoire sauvage, vaste et jusqu'alors inviolé.
De 1534 jusqu'ˆ 1979 (!), leur importance ne se dément pas; elles dépassent,
en
fait, le niveau de simple objet d'utilité quotidienne, pour devenir un
véritable phénomène de civilisation. De tout temps et de tout horizon,
le
Canadien a été placé directement en contact avec les armes à feu
et il
est
difficile de l'imaginer autrement. Encore aujourd'hui d'ailleurs, ce symbole
de
liberté reste intimement lié aux grands espaces et ˆ la tolérance
de la
société. Il singularise l'Amérique d'hier et d'aujourd'hui. Ici
en
Nouvelle-France, plaisons-nous à le répéter, ce ne sont pas uniquement
l'armée
et la noblesse qui ont la possibilité et le privilège de pouvoir porter
des
armes. La coutume canadienne plusieurs fois séculaire reconnaît à ous
le droit
légal et moral d'acquérir une arme à feu en vue d'une utilisation
libre
et non
contraignante."
Firearms, especially long guns, occupy a noble place in Canadian history
since they are no doubt responsible for the exploitation of a vast and wild
territory that had long remained untouched. From 1534 until 1979 (!), the
importance of firearms remained uncontested. More than a simple tool of
everyday life, they became truly a phenomenon of civilization. At all times and
whoever he was, the Canadian was directly in contact with firearms, and he
cannot be imagined otherwise. Even today, this symbol of liberty remains
intimately related to wide, open spaces, and to a tolerant society. It is the
distinctive mark of today's and yesterday's America. Here, in New France, let's
repeat it, it is not only soldiers and nobles who have the possibility or
privilege to bear arms. Century-old Canadian customs recognize equally to
everybody the legal and moral right to acquire a firearm and to use it freely
and noncoercively.
-- Russel Bouchard, Les armes à feu en Nouvelle-France (Montréal: Éditions du Septentrion, 1999),
p. 11.
"War is the health of the
State."
-- Randolph Bourne, The State (1918),
available at http://www.slip.net/~knabb/CF/bourne.htm.
James
BOVARD on democracy"Democracy must be something
more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner."
-- James Bovard, Lost Rights. The Destruction of American Liberty (St. Martin's Press: New York, 1994), p. 333.
Buy
Lost Rights. The Destruction of American Liberty at Amazon.com.
By the same author, see also Freedom
in Chains : The Rise of the State and the Demise of the Citizen (St. Martin's Press: New York, 2000).
"Tax limits, or fiscal
constraints generally, can be expected to curb government's appetites to the
extent that the utility function of governmental decision makers contains
arguments for privately enjoyable 'creature comforts,' for final end items of
consumption. Such constraints become much less effective, and may well be evaded,
if the motive force behind governmental action is 'do-goodism.' The licentious
sinners we can control; the saintly ascetics may destroy us."
-- Geoffrey Brennan and James M. Buchanan, The Power to Tax : Analytical
Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), p. 166; available at http://www.econlib.org/library/Buchanan/buchCv9Contents.html
(visited January 29, 2003).
"In this and other respects, my analysis lends potential support to modern-day anarchists, who dely the legitimacy of much of the action implemented by the governmental-bureaucratic apparatus."
-- James M. Buchanan, The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1975, p. 84; reproduced at http://www.econlib.org/library/Buchanan/buchCv7toc.html#The%20Limits%20of%20Liberty:%20Between%20Anarchy%20and%20Leviathan.
"By the time of the Enlightenment, the secular nation-state had almost reached its maturity, and nationalism, the sense of nationhood, was a more or less natural repository for the sentiments of those persons for whom God had died. For many, the state, as the collectivity, moved into the gap left by the demise of the church's parental role. ... The death of God and the birth of the national state, and especially in its latter-day welfare state form, are two sides of the coin of history in this respect."
-- James Buchanan, "Afraid To Be Free: Dependency ad Desideratum", Public Choice, No. 124 (2005), p. 25.
"The great inlet by which a
colour for oppression has entered into the world is by one man's pretending to
determine concerning the happiness of another."
-- Edmund Burke, quoted by Lord Acton in Lectures on the French Revolution
(London: 1910), in J. Rufus Fears (Ed.), Selected Writings of Lord Acton,
Vol. 1: Essays in the History of Liberty (Indianapolis:
LibertyClassics, 1985), p. 206.
"I think that every true
reformer, every real friend of liberty, will agree with me in saying that if we
must erect safeguards, they should be rather for the security of the individual
than of the mass, and that our chiefest care must be to train the majority to
respect the rights of the minority, to prevent the claims of the few from being
trampled under foot by the caprice or passion of the many."
-- Richard Cartwright in the Legislative Assembly, Canada, March 9, 1865;
reproduced in Janet Ajzenstat, Paul Romney, Ian
Gentles, and William D. Gairdner (Eds.), Canada's Founding Debates
(Toronto: Stoddart, 1999), p. 19.
"By Liberty I understand the
Power which every Man has over his own Actions, and his Right to enjoy the
Fruits of his Labour, Art, and Industry, as far as by it he hurts not the
Society, or any Members of it, by taking from any Member, or by hindering him
from enjoying what he himself enjoys. The Fruits of a Man's honest Industry are
the just Rewards of it, ascertained to him by natural and eternal Equity, as is
his Title to use them in the Manner which he thinks fit: And thus, with the
above Limitations, every Man is sole Lord and Arbitrer of his own private
Actions and Property."
-- Thomas Gordon, Letter 62 (1722) of Cato's Letters (1720-1723), quoted by Ronald Hamowy, "Cato's
Letters, John Locke, and the Republican Paradigm", in Edward J. Harpham
(Ed.), John Locke's Two
Treatises of Government: New Interpretations (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1992),
p. 157.
Buy
Cato's Letters at Amazon.com.
"Demandez-vous d'abord,
Messieurs, ce que de nos jours un Anglais, un Français, un habitant
des États-Unis de l'Amérique, entendent par le mot de liberté?
C'est pour chacun le droit de n'être soumis qu'aux lois, de ne pouvoir ni
être arrêté, ni détenu, ni mis àmort, ni maltraité d'aucune
manière,
par l'effet de la volonté arbitraire d'un ou de plusieurs individus. C'est
pour chacun le droit de dire son opinion, de choisir son industrie et de
l'exercer; de
disposer de sa propriété, d'en abuser même; d'aller, de venir,
sans en obtenir la permission, et sans rendre compte de ses motifs ou de
ses démarches.
C'est, pour chacun, le droit de se réunir à d'autres individus, soit
pour conférer
sur ses intérêts, soit pour professer le culte que lui et ses associés
préfèrent,
soit simplement pour remplir ses jours et ses heures d'une manière plus
conforme à ses inclinations, à ses fantaisies. Enfin, c'est le droit,
pour chacun, d'influer sur l'administration du gouvernement, soit par la
nomination
de tous ou de certains fonctionnaires, soit par des représentations, des
pétitions, des demandes,
que l'autorité est plus ou moins obligée de prendre
en considération. Comparez maintenant cette liberté à celle
des anciens."
Celle-ci consistait à exercer collectivement, mais directement, plusieurs
parties de la souveraineté tout entière, à délibérer,
sur la place publique, de la guerre et de la paix, à conclure avec les étrangers
des traités
d'alliance,
à voter les lois, à prononcer les jugements, à examiner les comptes,
les
actes, la gestion des magistrats, à les faire comparaître devant tout un
peuple, à les
mettre en accusation, à les condamner ou à les absoudre; mais en même
temps que c'était là ce que les anciens nommaient liberté,
ils admettaient, comme compatible avec cette liberté collective, l'assujettissement
complet de l'individu à l'autorité de l'ensemble."
First ask yourselves, Gentlemen, what an Englishman, a Frenchman, and a
citizen of the United States of America understand today by the word 'liberty'.
For each of them it is the right to be subjected only to the laws, and to be
neither arrested, detained, put to death of maltreated in any way by the
arbitrary will of one or more individuals. It is the right of everyone to
express their opinion, choose a profession and practice it, to dispose of
property, and even to abuse it; to come and go without permission, and without having
to account for their motives or undertakings. It is everyone's right to
associate with other individuals, either to discuss their interests, or to
profess the religion which they or their associates prefer, or even simply to
occupy their days or hours in a way which is more compatible with their
inclinations or whims. Finally, it is everyone's right to exercise some
influence on the administration of the government, either by electing all or
particular officials, or through representations, petitions, demands to which
the authorities are more or less compelled to pay heed. Now compare this
liberty with that of the ancients.
The latter consisted in exercising collectively, but directly, several parts of
the complete sovereignty; in deliberating, in the public square, over war and
peace; in forming alliances with foreign governments; in voting laws, in
pronouncing judgments; in examining the accounts, the acts, the stewardship of
the magistrates; in calling them to appear in front of the assembled people, in
accusing, condemning or absolving them. But if this was what the ancients
called liberty, they admitted as compatible with this collective freedom the
complete subjection of the individual to the authority of the community.
-- Benjamin Constant, "De la liberté des anciens comparée à celle
des modernes" (1819), in De la liberté chez les Modernes (Paris: Librairie Générale Française,
1980), pp. 494-495; English translation: "The Liberty of the Ancients
Compared with that of the Moderns" (1819), in Benjamin Constant, Political
Writings, Edited by Biancamaria Fontana
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 310-311.
Buy
Political Writings at Amazon.com.
ƒcrits
politiques en vente chez Amazon France.
"No duty, however, binds us
to these so-called laws, whose corrupting influence menaces what is noblest in
our being..."
-- Benjamin Constant, Principles of Politics Applicable to All Governments
(1810) (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2003), p. 401-402.
"Thus arbitrary power will
have divided men of superior intelligence into two groups: the former will be
seditious, the latter corrupt..."
-- Benjamin Constant, The Spirit of Conquest and Usurpation (1814),
reprinted in Political Writings, translated and edited by Bancamaria
Fontana (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 126. Later
editions than the 1814 one had "despotism" instead of "abitrary
power."
"It is a misfortune that we
offer the guilty the chance of impunity, but it is not nearly as bad as
delivering the good man to the vengeance of the oppressor."
-- Benjamin Constant, Principles of Politics Applicable to All Governments
(1810) (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2003), p. 160.
"The revolution is ... the
blow dealt ... agains the counter force of tyranny, which has never entirely
recovered from the blow, but which from then till now has gone on remolding and
regrappling the instruments of governmental power, that the Revolution sought
to shape and hold as defenses of liberty."
-- Voltairine de Cleyre, "Anarchism and American Traditions," Mother
Earth, 1909; reproduced in William Bonner and Pierre Lemieux (Eds.), The
Idea of America (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 2003), p. 223.
"In the process of helping
some (perhaps most) people to more utility and justice, the sate imposes on
civil society a system of interdictions and commands."
-- Anthony de Jasay, The State (Oxford:
Basic Blackwell, 1985), p. 123.
Buy
The State at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"People who live in states
have as a rule never experienced the state of nature and vice-versa, and have no practical possibility of moving from
the one to the other ... On what grounds, then, do people form hypotheses about
the relative merits of state and state of nature? ... My contention here is
that preferences for political arrangements of society are to a large extent
produced by these very arrangements, so that political institutions are either addictive like some drugs, or allergy-inducing like some others, or both, for they may be one thing
for some people and the other for others."
-- Anthony de Jasay, The State
(Oxford: Basic Blackwell, 1985), p. 18 and 20.
Buy
The State at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"Self-imposed limits on
sovereign power can disarm mistrust, but provide no guarantee of liberty and
property beyond those afforded by the balance between state and private
force."
-- Anthony de Jasay, The State [1985]
(Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998), p. 205.
Buy
The State at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"... the smaller is the
domain where choices among alternatives are made collectively, the smaller will
be the probability that any individual's preference gets overruled."
-- Anthony de Jasay, Against Politics: On Government, Anarchy, and Order
(London and New York: Routledge, 1997), p. 49.
"Having
gathered all power to itself, [the State] has become the sole focus of all
conflict, and it must construct totalitarian defences to match its total
exposure."
-- Anthony de Jasay, The State [1985]
(Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998), p. 287.
Buy
The State at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
-- Anthony de Jasay, The State [1985]
(Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998), p. 103.
Buy The
State at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"La démocracie, telle que
nous l'avons pratiquée, centralisatrice, réglementeuse et absolutiste,
apparaît
donc comme la période d'incubation de la tyrannie."
Democracy, then, in the centralizing, pattern-making, absolutist shape which
we have given to it is, it is clear, the time of tyranny's incubation.
-- Bertrand de Jouvenel, Du Pouvoir. Histoire naturelle de sa
croissance [1945] (Paris: Hachette, 1972),
p. 36; English translation: On Power: The Natural History of Its
Growth (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1993),
p. 15.
Du
Pouvoir. Histoire naturelle de sa croissance en vente chez Amazon
France.
Available
in English at Amazon.com.
"The more one considers the
matter, the clearer it becomes that redistribution is in effect far less a
redistribution of free income from the richer to the poorer, as we imagined,
than a redistribution of power from the individual to the State."
-- Bertrand de Jouvenel, The Ethics of Redistribution [1952] (Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1990),
p. 72.
Buy
The Ethics of Redistribution at Amazon.com.
" La croissance de son
autorité [l'autorité de l'État] apparaît aux individus
bien moins comme une entreprise continuelle contre leur liberté que comme
un effort destructeur des dominations auxquelles ils sont assujettis. [...]
Où est
le terme? [...] C'est la pleine liberté de chacun à l'égard de toutes
autorités
familiales et sociales, payée d'une entière soumission à l'État."
The growth of its authority [the state's authority] strikes private
individuals as being not so much a continual encroachment of their liberty as
an attempt to put down the various petty tyrannies to which they have been
subjected. ... Where will it end? ... In each man's absolute freedom from every
family and social authority, a freedom the price of which is complete
submission to the state.
-- Bertrand de Jouvenel, Du Pouvoir. Histoire naturelle de sa croissance [1945] (Paris: Hachette, 1972), pp. 271 and
279; English translation: On Power: The Natural History of Its Growth (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1993), pp. 143 and 187.
Du
Pouvoir. Histoire naturelle de sa croissance en vente chez Amazon
France.
Available
in English at Amazon.com.
So far the debasement of the electors and the degradation of the assembly are only accidental. They are to become by progressive stages systematized. Syndicates of interests and ambitions will soon take shape which, regarding the assembly as a mere adjunct of Power and the people as a mere cistern for the assembly, will devote themselves to winning votes for the installation of tame deputies who will bring back to their masters the price for which they have ventured everytning, the command of society."
L'avilissement de l'électeur et l'abaissement de l'élu ne sont encore qu'accidentels. Ils vont progressivement devenir systématiques. Des syndicats d'intérêt et d'ambions se formeront qui, regardant l'assemblée commeune simple attributrice du Pouvoir et le peuple comme un simple remplisseur de l'assemblée, s'ingénieront à capter les suffrages pour investir des députés dociles, qui rapporteront à leurs maîtres l'enjeu de toute l'opération, le commandement de la Société.
Bertrand de Jouvenel, Du Pouvoir. Histoire naturelle de sa croissance [1945] (Paris: Hachette, 1972), p. 440; English translation: On Power: The Natural History of Its Growth (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1993), p. 299.
"Aucun roi n'a disposé d'une
police comparable à celle des démocraties modernes."
No absolute monarch ever had at his disposal a police force comparable to
those of modern democracies.
-- Bertrand de Jouvenel, Du
Pouvoir. Histoire naturelle de sa croissance [1945] (Paris: Hachette,
1972), p. 49; English translation: On Power: The Natural History of
Its Growth (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1993), p. 23.
"Mais c'est plaisir de
considerer qu'est ce qui leur revient de ce grand tourment, et le bien quils
peuvent attendre de leur peine et de leur miserable vie. Volontiers le peuple
du mal quil souffre, n'en accuse point le tiran, mais ceux qui le gouvernent:
ceus la les peuples, les nations, tout le monde a l'envi iusques aus paisans,
iusques aus laboureurs ils scavent leurs noms, ils dechifrent leurs vices,
ils amassent sur eus mille vilenies, mille maudissons; toutes leurs oraisons,
tous
leurs veus sont contre ceus la; tous leurs mal heurs, toutes les pestes,
toutes les famines ils les leur reprochent; et si quelque fois il leur font
par
apparence quelque honneur, lors mesmes ils les maugreent en leur coeur, et
les ont en horreur plus estrange que les bestes sauvages. Voila la gloire,
voila
lhonneur quils recoivent de leur service envers les gens, desquels quand
chacun auroit une piece de leur corps, ils ne seroient pas ancore, ce leur
semble,
assés satisffaits, ni a demi saoulés de leur peine, mais certes ancore
apres quils sont morts, ceus qui viennent apres ne sont jamais si paresseus
que le
nom de ces mangepeuples ne soit noirci de l'encre de mille plumes, et leur
reputation deschirée dans mille livres, et les os mesmes par maniere de dire
trainés par la postérité, les punissans ancore apres leur mort
de leur meschante vie."
However, there is satisfaction in examining what they get out of all this
torment, what advantage they derive from all the trouble of their wretched
existence. Actually the people never blame the tyrant for the evils they
suffer, but they do place responsibility on those who influence him; peoples,
nations, all compete with one another, even the peasants, even the tillers of
the soil, in mentioning the names of the favorites, in analyzing their vices,
and heaping upon them a thousand insults, a thousand obscenities, a thousand
maledictions. All their prayers, all their vows are directed against these
persons; they hold them accountable for all their misfortunes, their
pestilences, their famines; and if at times they show them outward respect, at
those very moments they are fuming in their hearts and hold them in greater
horror than wild beasts. This is the glory and honor heaped upon influential
favorites for their services by people who, if they could tear apart their
living bodies, would still clamor for more, only half satiated by the agony
they might behold. For even when the favorites are dead those who live after
are never too lazy to blacken the names of these people-eaters with the ink of
a thousand pens, tear their reputations into bits in a thousand books, and
drag, so to speak, their bones past posterity, forever punishing them after
their death for their wicked lives.
-- Estienne de la Boétie, Discours de la servitude volontaire (1574-1576), in Oeuvres complètes
d'Estienne de la Boétie, Vol. 1,
William Blake and Co. Edit., 1991, p. 96; English translation: The
Discourse of Voluntary Servitude.
Discours
de la servitude volontaire en vente chez Amazon France.
Available
in English at Amazon.com, with an introduction by Murray Rothbard.
"Au-dessus de ceux-là
s'élève un pouvoir immense et tutélaire, qui se charge seul
d'assurer leur jouissance et de veiller sur leur sort. Il est absolu, prévoyant,
régulier
et doux. Il ressemblerait à la puissance paternelle si, comme elle, il avait
pour objet de préparer les hommes à l'âge viril; mais il ne cherche,
au contraire, qu'à les fixer irrévocablement dans l'enfance; il aime
que les citoyens se réjouissent pourvu qu'ils ne songent qu'à se réjouir.
Il travaille volontiers à
leur bonheur; mais il veut en être l'unique agent et le seul arbitre; il
pourvoit à leur sécurité, prévoit et assure leurs besoins,
facilite leurs plaisirs, conduit leurs principales affaires, dirige leur
industrie,
règle
leurs successions, divise leurs héritages; que ne peut-il leur ôter
entièrement
le trouble de penser et la peine de vivre ?"
Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes
upon itself alone to secure their gratifications and to watch over their fate.
That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident, and mild. It would be like
the authority of a parent if, like that authority, its object was to prepare
men for manhood; but it seeks, on the contrary, to keep them in perpetual
childhood: it is well content that the people should rejoice, provided they
think of nothing but rejoicing. For their happiness such a government willingly
labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that
happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their
necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns,
directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their
inheritances: what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all
the trouble of living?
-- Alexis de Tocqueville, De la démocratie en Amérique, Vol.
2 (1840), Part 5, Chap. 6 (Paris: Laffont, 1986), p. 648; English translation
reproduced
in William Bonner and Pierre Lemieux (Eds.), The Idea of America
(Belles Lettres, 2003), p. 84.
"After having thus
successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and
fashioned him at will, the supreme power then extends its arm over the whole
community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated
rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most
energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man
is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it
to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not
destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses,
enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to
nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the
government is the shepherd."
-- Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, Vol. II (London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1899), Chap. 6; available
at http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/DETOC/ch4_06.htm
(visited December 22, 2002).
"Quand donc je refuse d'obéir à une
loi injuste, je ne dénie point àla majorité le droit
de commander; j'en appelle seulement de la souveraineté du peuple à la
souveraineté du genre humain.
Il y a des gens qui n'ont pas craint de dire qu'un peuple, dans les objets
qui n'intéressaient que lui-même, ne pouvait sortir entièrement
des limites de la justice et de la raison, et qu'ainsi on ne devait pas craindre
de donner tout pouvoir à la majorité qui le représente.
Mais c'est là un langage d'esclave."
-- Alexis de Tocqueville, De la Démocratie en Amérique, Livre I [1835], Partie 2, Chapitre 7, section 2.
De
la Démocratie en Amérique en vente chez Amazon France.
Available
in English at Amazon.com.
"Any one having a white
face, and being so disposed, could stop us, and subject us to examination. ...
When I get there [in Pennsylvania], I shall not be required to have a pass; I
can travel without being disturbed."
-- Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an
American Slave, Written by Himself [1845]
(Toronto: New American Library, 1968), p. 77 and 93-94.
Buy
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave et
Amazon.com.
Also
available in French at Amazon.fr.
"... and in thinking of my
life, I almost forgot my liberty."
-- Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an
American Slave, Written by Himself [1845]
(Toronto: New American Library, 1968), p. 103.
Buy
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave et
Amazon.com.
Also
available in English at Amazon.fr.
"Let us render the tyrant no
aid; let us not hold the light by which he can trace the footprints of our
flying brother."
-- Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an
American Slave, Written by Himself [1845]
(Toronto: New American Library, 1968), p. 106.
Buy
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave et
Amazon.com.
Also
available in English at Amazon.fr.
"[U]n anarchiste est un
libéral intransigeant."
An anarchist is an uncomprimising liberal.
-- Émile Faguet, Politiques et moralistes du dix-neuvime sicle, Vol. 1 (Paris: Société Française d'Imprimerie et de
Librairie, c. 1898), p. 226.
"Those who would give up
essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither
Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, quoted in Suzy Platt, Respectfully Quoted: A
Dictionary of Quotations (Barnes and Noble,
1993), p. 201.
David
FRIEDMAN on firearms, dissuasion and crime"Suppose one little old lady
in ten carries a gun. Suppose that one in ten of those, if attacked by a
mugger, succeeds in killing the mugger instead of being killed by him -- or
shooting herself in the foot. On average, the mugger is much more likely to win
the encounter than the little old lady. But -- also on average -- every hundred
muggings produces one dead mugger. At those odds, mugging is an unprofitable
business -- not many little old ladies carry enough money to justify one chance
in a hundred of being killed getting it. The number of muggers declines
drastically, not because they have all been killed but because they have,
rationally, sought safer professions."
-- David Friedman, Hidden Order: The Economics of Everyday Life (New York: Harper, 1996), p. 299.
Buy
Hidden Order: The Economics of Everyday Life at Amazon.com.
"Moreover, I am not myself a conservative. I am a liberal in the classical ssense or, in the terminology that has become common in the USA, a libertarian in philosophy."
-- Milton Friedman, interviewed in Brian Snowdon and Howard R. Vane, Modern Macroeconomics: Its Origins, Development and Current State (Cheltehnam, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2005), p. 207.
"All economists -- monetarists, Keynesians, or what-not -- recognize that there is such a thing as market failure. I believe that what distinguishes economists is not whether they recognize market failure, but how much importance they attach to government failure, especially when when government seeks to remedy what are said to be market failures. That difference in turn is related to the time perspective that economists bring to various issues. Speaking for myself, I do not believe that I have more faith in the equilibrating tendencies of market forces than most Keynesians, but I have far less faith than most economists, whether Keynesians or monetarists, in the ability of government to offset market failure without making matters worse."
-- Milton Friedman, interviewed in Brian Snowdon and Howard R. Vane, Modern Macroeconomics: Its Origins, Development and Current State (Cheltehnam, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2005), p. 212.
"If, for example, existing
government intervention is minor, we shall attach a smaller weight to the
negative effect of additional government intervention. This is an important
reason why many earlier liberals, like Henry Simons, writing at a time when
government was small by todayÕs standards, were willing to have government
undertake activities that todayÕs liberals would not accept now that government
has become so overgrown."
-- Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 1962), p. 32.
"'Poor old man,' Mrs Everest
wrote, 'have you tried the heroin I got you -- get a bottle of Elliman's
embrocation & rub your face when you go to bed & tie your sock up over
your face, after rubbing for 1/4 of an hour, try it and I am sure it will do
you good.'"
-- Martin Gilbert, Churchill: A Life
(London: Heinemann, 1991), p. 27.
"That autumn [1890, when
Churchill was 15] he began to smoke, provoking further criticism. 'Darling
Winston,' his mother wrote in September, 'I hope you will try & not smoke.
If only you knew how foolish & how silly you look doing it you would give
it up, at least for a few years.' There was to be an inducement to giving up
smoking. 'I will get Papa to get you a gun and a pony.' Churchill deferred to
his mother's advice. He would give up smoking 'at any rate for six months'. ...
'The two brothers [Churchill and his younger borther] have been happy as kings
riding and shooting', Lady Randolph wrote..."
-- Martin Gilbert, Churchill: A Life
(London: Heinemann, 1991), pp. 25 and 28.
"The [classical] liberal, of
course, does not deny that there are some superior people -- he is not an
egalitarian -- but he denies that anyone has authority to decide who these
superior people are."
-- Friedrich Hayek, "Why I Am Not a Conservative," postcript to The
Constitution of Liberty [1960] (Chicago:
Henry Regnery, 1972), p. 402.
Buy
The Constitution of Liberty at Amazon.com.
"... it is this nationalistic bias which frequently provides the bridge from conservatism to collectivism: to think in terms of 'our' industry or resource is only a short step away from demanding that these national assets be directed in the national interest."
-- Friedrich Hayek, "Why I Am Not a Conservative," postcript to The Constitution of Liberty [1960] (Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1972), p. 405.
Buy The Constitution of Liberty at Amazon.com.
"It is indeed probable that
more harm and misery have been caused by men determined to use coercion to
stamp out a moral evil than by men intent on doing evil."
-- F.A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 1972), p. 146.
"The Good Society is one in which the chances of anyone selected at random are likely to be as great as possible."
-- Friedrich Hayek, Law Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 2: The Mirage of Social Justice (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976), p. 132.
"[I]t is not the source but
the limitation of power which prevents it from being arbitrary."
-- F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1944), p. 71.
"It used to be the boast of
free men that, so long as they kept within the bounds of the known law, there
was no need to ask anybody's permission or to obey anybody's orders. It is
doubtful whether any of us can make this claim today."
-- F.A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 1972), p. 208.
" But though the concepton of a 'value to
society' is sometimes carelessly used even by economists, there is strictly no
such thing and the expression implies the same sort of anthropomorphism or
personification of society as the term 'social justice'. Services can have
value only to particular people (or an organization), and any particular
service will have very different values for different members of the same
society. To regard them differently is to treat society not as a spontaneous order
of free men but as an organization whose members are all made to serve a single
hierarchy of ends. This would necessarily be a totalitarian system in which
personal freedom would be absent."
-- F.A. Hayek, Law, Legislation and
Liberty, vol. 2: The Mirage of Social Justice (Chicago : University of Chicago Press,
1976), pp. 75-76.
Stephen
HALBROOK on Nazi gun controls"Such questions have never
been discussed in scholarly publications because the Nazi laws, policies, and
practices have never been adequately documented. The record establishes that a
well-meaning liberal republic would enact a gun control act that would later be
highly useful to a dictatorship."
-- Stephen P.Halbrook, "Nazi Firearms Law and the Disarming of the German
Jews, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 17, No. 3 (2000), pp. 483-535; available at http://www.stephenhalbrook.com/article-nazilaw.pdf.
By this author, see That
Every Man Be Armed : The Evolution of a Constitutional Right and Target
Switzerland : Swiss Armed Neutrality in World War II. Available
at Amazon.com.
"The deep dislike of juries by [former French Regime] seigneurs and officers was probably not shared, at least not for the same reasons, by other Canadians [after the 1760 English Conquest]. They disliked the time it took to serve, but the Chief Justice said they made good jurymen, followed his directions, and in general were pleased with the institution. Carleton, the Governor, thought they were 'extremely flattered and pleased' with their occasional role in helping to decide verdicts. This seems a plausible interpretation. Before the Conquest French officials in Quebec routinely damned the intransigent insubordination, the social pretensions, the egalitarianism and the bloodymindednpss of the French [Canadian] inhabitant. He would not pay taxes, he would pay only half the level of the tithe in France, he would not doff his hat to a socia1 superior and he enjoyed far too high wages, which gave him the independence to do all these things. The authority of the law was one of the few areas where he could not set foot, and the royal officers of justice, a socially homogeneous group of professionals, did not share their authority. For ordinary Canadians, suddenly to step into the shoes of the Lieutenant général et civil must have been a heady experience."
-- Douglas Hay, "The Meanings of Criminal Law in Québec, 1764-1774," in Louis A. Knafla, Crime and Criminal Justice in Europe and Canada (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1981), p. 95.
"Is life so dear, or peace
so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it,
Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me
liberty or give me death!."
-- Patrick Henry, Speech of March 23, 1775, reproduced at www.law.ou.edu/hist/henry.html.
"If we cannot learn, if the
only effect upon us of the presence of the dynamiter in our midst is to make us
multiply punishments, invent restrictions, increase the number of our official
spies, forbid public meetings, interfere with the press, put up gratings -- as
in one country they propose to do -- in our House of Commons, scrutinize
visitors under official microscopes, request them, as at Vienna, and I think
now at Paris also, to be good enough to leave their greatcoats in the
vestibules ... I venture to prophesy that there lies before us a bitter and an
evil time."
-- Auberon Herbert, "The Ethics of Dynamite", Contemporary Review, May 1894; reproduced in The Right and
Wrong of Compulsion by the State, and Other Essays by Auberon Herbert (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1978), p. 226.
Buy
The Right and Wrong of Compulsion by the State at Amazon.com.
"And what sort of
philosophical doctrine is this -- that numbers confer unlimited rights, that
they take from some persons all rights over themselves, and vest these rights
in others. ... How, then, can the rights of three men exceed the rights of two
men? In what possible way can the rights of three men absorb the rights of two
men, and make them as if they had never existed. ... It is not possible to
suppose, without absurdity, than a man should have no rights over his own body
and mind, and yet have a 1/10,000,000th share in unlimited rights over all
other bodies and minds?"
-- Auberon Herbert, "The Ethics of Dynamite", Contemporary Review, May 1894; reproduced in The Right and
Wrong of Compulsion by the State, and Other Essays by Auberon Herbert (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1978), pp.
202-203.
Buy
The Right and Wrong of Compulsion by the State at Amazon.com.
"If government half a
century ago had provided us with all our dinners and breakfasts, it would be
the practice of our orators today to assume the impossibility of our providing
for ourselves."
-- Auberon Herbert, "State Education: A Help or Hindrance", Fornightly
Review, July 1880; reproduced in The
Right and Wrong of Compulsion by the State, and Other Essays by Auberon Herbert (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1978), p. 77.
Buy
The Right and Wrong of Compulsion by the State at Amazon.com.
"... every tax or rate,
forcibly taken from an unwilling person, is immoral and oppressive."
-- Auberon Herbert, "The Principles of Voluntaryism" [1897],
reproduced in The Right and Wrong of Compulsion by the State, and Other
Essays by Auberon Herbert (Indianapolis:
Liberty Classics, 1978), p. 393.
Buy
The Right and Wrong of Compulsion by the State at Amazon.com.
"God forbid we should ever
be 20 years without such a rebellion ... what country can preserve it's
liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people
preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. ... The tree of liberty
must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and
tyrants."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Smith, November 13, 1787; reproduced in
Thomas Jefferson, Writings (The Library
of America, 1984), p. 911.
"The spirit of resistance to
government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to be always
kept alive. It will often be exercised when wrong, but better so than not to be
exercised at all. I like a little rebellion now and then."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Abigail Adams, February 22, 1787; reproduced in
Thomas Jefferson, Writings (The Library
of America, 1984), p. 889-890.
"Les femmes sont tout à
fait compétentes pour assurer leur légitime défense, pourvu que
la loi ne les transforme pas en criminelles si elles emploient des moyens
efficaces à cette
fin."
Women are quite able to see to their own defence, as long as the law does
not transform them into criminals if they take effective measures to do so.
-- Claire Joly, Marie Latourelle, Maryse Martin, and Karen Selick,
"Testostérone et contrôle des armes" , Le Devoir, February 19, 1999, p. A-11; reproduced on this
site in the original French
version, and in an English
translation.
"The issue isn't gun control
but state control -- obtuse and arbitrary state control, state control run
amok. ... Forget guns. If Dr. Hudson, Mr. Turnbull, Dr. Gingrich and others end
up in jail it won't be for their guns but our liberties."
-- George Jonas, "The Issue Isn't Gun Control but State Control", National
Post, July 23, 2003, p. A-15.
"The inhabitant of London
could order by telephone, sipping his morning tea in bed, the various products
of the whole earth … he could at the same time and by the same means adventure
his wealth in the natural resources and new enterprise of any quarter of the
world … he could secure forthwith, if he wished, cheap and comfortable means of
transit to any country or climate without passport or other formality…"
-- John Maynard Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace (London: Macmillan, 1919), p. 11.
"We live in an age of "policy wonks" who judge programs by their effect on productivity, or output, or work effort. Wonkian analysis uses the jargon of economics while ignoring its content. Economists view the wonks' fixation on output as a bizarre and unhealty obsession. Wonks want Americans to die rich; economists want Americans to die happy."
-- Steven E. Landsburg, The Armchair Economist: Economics and Everyday Life (New York: Free Press, 1993), p. 44.
"Et pour tuer le temps, en
attendant la mort,
Je fume au nez des dieux de fines cigarettes."
And to kill time while awaiting death,
I smoke slender cigarettes thumbing my nose to the gods.
-- Jules Laforgue, "La cigarette" (1880), quoted by Richard Klein, Cigarettes
are Sublime (Durham and London: Duke
University Press, 1993), pp. 57-58; French translation: De la cigarette... (Paris: Seghers, 1995).
Buy
Cigarettes are Sublime at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française et version
originale anglaise en vente chez Amazon France.
"Sir, rebellion is always an evil, it is always an offence against the positive law of a nation; it is not always a moral crime."
-- Sir Wilfrid Laurier, quoted in O.D. Skelton, Life and Letters of Sir Wilfred Laurier (1921), Vol. 1 (Toronto: McClellan & Stewart. 1965), p. 92.
"The Care therefore of every
man's Soul belongs unto himself, and is to be left unto himself. But what if he
neglect the Care of his Soul? I answer, What if he neglects the Care of his
Health, or of his Estate, which things are nearlier related to the Government
of the Magistrate than the other? Will the magistrate provide by an express
Law, That such an one shall not become poor or sick? Laws provide, as much as
is possible, that the Goods and Health of Subjects be not injured by the Fraud
and Violence of others; they do not guard them from the Negligence or
Ill-husbandry of the Possessors themselves."
-- John Locke, A Letter Concerning Toleration [1689], Edited and Introduced by James H. Tully (Hacklett Publishing
Company, 1983), p. 35.
Buy
A Letter Concerning Toleration at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française et version
originale anglaise en vente chez Amazon France.
"If the innocent honest Man
must quietly quit all he has for Peace sake, to him who will lay violent hands
upon it, I desire it may be considered what kind of Peace there will be in the
World, which consists only in Violence and Rapine; and which is to be
maintained only for the benefit of Robbers and Oppressors."
-- John Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government [1690], #228 (Lasslet Edition, Cambridge University
Press, 1960), p. 465.
Buy
Second Treatise
of Civil Governement at Amazon.com.
"... whenever the Legislators
endeavour to take away, and destroy the Property of the People, or to reduce them to Slavery under Arbitrary Power,
they put themselves into a state of War with the People, who are thereupon
absolved from any farther Obedience ... [Power then] devolves to the People,
who have a Right to resume their original Liberty, and, by the Establishment of
a new Legislative (such as they shall think fit) provide for their own Safety
and Security, which is the end for which they are in Society."
... quand les législateurs
s'efforcent de ravir et de déruire les choses qui appartiennent en propre au
peuple, ou de le réduire dans l'esclavage, sous un pouvoir
arbitraire, ils se mettent dans l'état de guerre avec le peuple qui, dès lors,
est absous et exempt de toute sorte d'obéissance à leur égard, et a le droit de
recourir à ce commun refuge que Dieu a destiné pour tous les hommes, contre la
force et la violence. [...] [Le pouvoir] est dévolu au peuple qui a le droit de
reprendre sa liberté originaire, et par l'établissement d'une nouvelle autorité
législative, tel qu'il jugera ˆ propos, de pourvoir à sa propre conservation et
à sa propre sûreté, qui est la fin qu'on se propose quand on forme une société politique.
-- John Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government [1690], #222 (Lasslet Edition, Cambridge University
Press, 1960), p. 460-461; French translation by David Mazel (1691): Traité
de gouvernement civil (Paris:
Garnier-Flammarion, 1984), pp. 348-349.
Buy
Second Treatise
of Civil Governement at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française et version
originale anglaise en vente chez Amazon France.
"If the rest of the country
had adopted right-to-carry concealed-handgun provisions in 1992, about 1,500
murders and 4,000 rapes would have been avoided."
-- John R. Lott, Jr., More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun
Control Laws (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 1998), p. 159.
Buy More
Guns, Less Crime (2nd Edition) at
Amazon.com.
Also
available in English at Amazon France.
"Ignorantque datos, ne
quisquam serviat, enses."
And they are ignorant that the purpose of the sword is to save every man
from slavery.
-- Lucanus (A.D. 39-65), De Bello Civili (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, 1988),
IV, 579, p. 216.
"Perhaps it is a universal
truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to provisions against
danger, real or apprehended, from abroad."
-- James Madison to Thomas Jefferson, May 13, 1798; reproduced in Jack N.
Rakove (Ed.), James Madison: Writings (New York: Literary Classics of
the United States, 1999), p. 588.
"If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions."
-- Federalist # 51, at www.constitution.org/fed/federa51.htm.
"The internal effects of a
mutable policy are [...] calamitous. It poisons the blessings of liberty
itself. It will be of little avail to the people that the laws are made by men
of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or
so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed before they
are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man who knows what
the law is today can guess what it will be tomorrow."
-- Federalist # 62, in The Federalist (Indianapolis: Modern Library and National Foundation for Education in
American Citizenship, n.d.), p. 406.
"It was during the
eighteenth century -- a period of boastful satisfaction with the nice balances
within the English constitution -- that Englishmen came to accept the Whig view
of the utility of an armed citizenry. The armed citizen was not only affirmed
to be protecting himself but, together with his fellows, provided the ultimate
check on tyranny."
-- Joyce Malcolm, To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American
Right (Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
1994), p. 128.
Buy
To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American Right at
Amazon.com.
"The right of ordinary
citizens to possess weapons is the most extraordinary, most controversial, and
least understood of those liberties secured by Englishmen and bequeathed to
their American colonists. It lies at the very heart of the relationship between
the individual and his fellows, and between the individual and his
government."
-- Joyce Malcolm, To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American
Right (Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
1994), p. IX.
Buy
To Keep and Bear Arms: The Origins of an Anglo-American Right at
Amazon.com.
Patrick
McGOOWAN ("The Prisoner") on numbering people"I am not a number, I am a
free man!"
-- Number Six, The Prisoner, 1968, the
famous TV series.
Available at Amazon.com for zone 1: Set 1
(DVDs), Set 1
(VHS), complete
collection (DVDs).
Version française en vente chez Amazon France (zone 2): complete
collection (DVDs).
"Over himself, over his own
body and mind, the individual is sovereign."
-- John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859)
(Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1978), p. 9.
Buy
On Liberty at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"... when a City shall be as
it were besieged and blocked about, her navigable river infested, inroads and
incursions round, defiance and battle oft rumoured to be marching up even to
her walls and suburb trenches, that then the people, or the greater part, more
than at other times, wholly taken up with the study of highest and most
important matters to be reformed, should be disputing, reasoning, reading,
inventing, discoursing, even to a rarity and admiration, things not before
discoursed or written of ..."
-- John Milton, Aeropagitica: A Speech for the Liberty of Unlicensed
Printing, to the Parliament of England (1644), available at http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1209&Itemid=99999999.
"It is impossible to
understand the history of economic thought if one does not pay attention to the
fact that economics as such is a challenge to the conceit of those in power. An
economist can never be a favorite of autocrats and demagogues. With them he is
always the mischief-maker, and the more they are inwardly convinced that his
objections are well-founded, the more they hate him."
-- Ludwig von Mises, Human Action. A Treatise on Economics (1949), Third Revised Edition (San Francisco: Fox
& Wilkes, 1963), p. 67.
Buy
Human Action. A Treatise on Economics at Amazon.com.
"Violent resistance against
the power of the state is the last resort of the minority in its effort to
break loose from the oppression of the majority. ... The citizen must not be so
narrowly circumscribed in his activities that, if he thinks differently from
those in power, his only choice is either to perish or to destroy the machinery
of state."
-- Ludwig von Mises, Liberalism. The Classical Tradition (1927), Fourth American Edition
(Irvington-on-Hudson: Foundation for Economic Education, 1996), p. 59,
available at http://www.mises.org/liberal.asp.
Buy
Liberalism. The Classical Tradition at Amazon.com.
"We believe that human
happiness requires freedom and that freedom requires limited government."
-- Charles Murray, What It Means to Be a Libertarian: A Personal
Interpretation (New York: Broadway Books,
1997), p. xi.
"It is interesting to
observe that in the year 1935 the average individual's incurious attitude
towards the phenomenon of the State is precisely what his attitude was toward
the phenomenon of the Church in the year, say, 1500. ... it does not appear to
have occurred to the Church-citizen of that day, any more than it occurs to the
State-citizen of the present, to ask what sort of institution it was that
claimed his allegiance."
-- Albert Jay Nock, Our Enemy, the State,
c. 1935 (Delavan: Hallberg, 1983), p. 34.
Buy
Our Enemy, the State at Amazon.com.
"The socialist society would
have to forbid capitalist acts between consenting adults."
-- Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1994), p.163.
"Sometimes, when leading families or merchants organized a government for their city, they not only provided for some power sharing through voting but took pains to reduce the probability that the government's chief executive could assume autocratic power. For a time in Genoa, for example, the chief administrator of the government had to be an outsider -- and thus someone with no membership in any of the powerful families in the city. Moreover, he was constrained to a fixed term of office, forced to leave the city after the end of his term, and forbidden from marrying into any of the local families. In Venice, after a doge who attempted to make himself autocrat was beheaded for his offense, subsequent doges were followed in official processions by a sword-bearing symbolic executioner as a reminder of the punishment intended for any leader who attempted to assume dictatorial power."
-- Mancur Olson, Power and Prosperity. Outgrowing Communist and Capitalist Dictatorships (New York: Basic Books, 2000), p. 39.
"From the foregoing account it will be seen that in Newspeak the expression of unorthodox opinions, above a very low level, was well-night impossible. It was of course possible to utter heresies of a very crude kind, a species of blasphemy. It wold have been possible, for example, to say Big Brogher is ungood. But this statement, which to an orthodox ear merely conveyed a self-evident absurdity, could not have been sustained by reasoned argument, because the necessary words were not available."
-- George Orwell, "The Principles of Newspeak", in 1984 (1949) (New York: Signet Classic, 1977), p. 309.
Georges
ORWELL on the importance of common peoples having guns"In such a force,
cooperation among different parts of society would replace the traditional
reliance on upper-class leadership, and a large, well-armed popular militia
would act as a sort of insurance policy against government tyranny at home. At
the end of an article on the Home Guard in Tribune, Orwell wrote: 'That rifle hanging on the wall of
the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is
our job to see that it stays there.'"
-- Michael Shelden, Orwell: The Authorized Biography (New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1991), p. 328.
Buy
1984 at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française et version
originale anglaise en vente chez Amazon France.
"Like various other words in the B vocabulary [in Newspeak], duckspeak was ambivalent in meaning. Provided that the opinions which were quacked out were orthodox ones, it implied nothing but praise, and when the Times referred to one of the orators of the Party as a doubleplusgood duckspeaker it was paying a warm and valued compliment."
-- George Orwell, "The Principles of Newspeak", in 1984 (1949) (New York: Signet Classic, 1977), p. 308.
"It was always the women,
and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents to the Party,
the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of
unorthodoxy."
-- George Orwell, 1984 (1949) (Hammondsworth: Penguin, 1987),
p. 12.
" L'individualisme est une
doctrine qui, au lieu de subordonner l'individu à la collectivité,
pose en principe que l'individu a sa fin en lui-même; qu'en
fait et en droit il possède
une valeur propre et une existence autonome, et que l'idéal social
est le plus complet affranchissement de l'individu. L'individualisme
ainsi compris est la
même chose que ce qu'on appelle encore la philosophie sociale
libertaire."
-- Georges Palante, L'individualisme aristocratique, Paris, Belles Lettres, 1995, pp. 135-136.
L'individualisme
aristocratique en vente chez Amazon France.
"... in all countries where
personal freedom is valued, however much each individual may rely on legal
redress, the right of each to carry arms -- and these the best and the sharpest
-- for his own protection in case of extremity, is a right of nature indelible
and irrepressible, and the more it is sought to be repressed the more it will
recur."
-- James Paterson, Commentaries on the Liberty of the Subject and the Laws
of England Relating to the Security of the Person, (London, 1877), Vol. 1, p. 441; quoted in Joyce Malcolm, To
Keep and Bear Arms. The Origins of an Anglo-American Right (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994), pp.
169-170.
Buy
To Keep and Bear Arms. The Origins of an Anglo-American Right at
Amazon.com.
"L'homme vivant sous la
servitude des lois prend sans s'en douter une âme d'esclave."
The man who lives under the servitude of laws takes, without being aware of
it, the soul of a slave.
-- Georges Ripert, Le Déclin du Droit. Etude sur la législation
contemporaine (Paris: Librairie
Générale de
Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1949), p. 94.
Le
Déclin du Droit. Etude sur la législation contemporaine en
vente chez Amazon France.
"En présence d'une aussi
étroite réglementation, l'homme peut-il encore se dire libre pour cette
raison que la tyrannie qu'il subit est celle de la loi? Sans doute la puissance
légale
ne porte pas le nom de tyrannie parce qu'elle paraît établie dans un
intérêt
commun par la volonté générale, et en tout cas parce que
l'arbitraire a peu l'occasion de se manifester. Mais le maître serait-il
équitable, cela ne saurait empêcher ses sujets d'être esclaves.
[...] Et quand la servitude dure et que la pensée se conforme à l'action,
l'État
devient totalitaire et la sujétion est complète. Comme c'est une servitude
légale,
on continue à dire que
le régime est démocratique. C'est l'hypocrisie du langage politique."
Confronted with such a tight regulation, can man pretend to be free because
the tyranny he is subjected to derives from the law? Of course, the legal power
is not called "tyranny" since it appears to be established by the
general will in the common interest, and since, in any event, occurrences of
arbitrary power are infrequent. But a master's equity does not mean that his
subjects are not slaves. ... And when their servitude lasts and their thoughts
follow their behavior, the state becomes totalitarian and subjection is
complete. Since it is legal servitude, the regime is still said to be
democratic. Such is the hypocrisy of political language.
-- Georges Ripert, Le Déclin du Droit. Etude sur la législation
contemporaine (Paris: Librairie Générale de
Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1949), p. 69.
Le
DŽclin du Droit. Etude sur la lŽgislation contemporaine en vente chez
Amazon France.
"Nous continuons à dire
que nul n'est censé ignorer la loi. Mais il faut reconnaître quelque
mérite à ceux
qui la connaissent."
We continue to claim that nobody is supposed to ignore the law. But we must
give some credit to those who know it.
-- Georges Ripert, Le Déclin du Droit. Éude sur la législation
contemporaine (Paris: Librairie Générale
de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1949), p. 165.
Le
Déclin du Droit. Etude sur la léislation contemporaine en
vente
chez
Amazon France.
"As we see nowadays in South-East Asia or the Caribbean, the misery of being exploited by capitalists is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all."
-- Joan Robinson, Economic Philosophy (Chicago: Aldine, 1962), p. 45.
"Je ne voudrais pas d'un paradis où l’on n’eût pas le droit de préférer l’enfer."
I wouldn't want a paradise where it would be forbidden to prefer hell.
-- Jean Rostand, Pensées d'un biologiste (Paris: Stock, 1954), p. 220.
"Perhaps the word that best defines our [the libertarians'] distinction is 'radical.' Radical in the sense of being in total, root-and-branch opposition to the existing political system and to the State itself. Radical in the sense of having integrated inetellectual opposition to the State with a gut hatred of its pervasive and organized system of crime and injustice. Radical in the sense of a deep commitment to the spirit of liberty and anti-statism that integrates reason and emotion,heart and soul."
-- Murray Rothbard, "Do You Hate the State?", The Libertarian Forum, Vol. 10, No. 7 (July 1977); reproduced at www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard75.html.
"It is also important for the State to inculcate in its subjects an aversion to any outcropping of what is now called 'a conspiracy theory of history.' For a search for 'conspiracies,' as misguided as the results often are, means a search for motives, and an attribution of individual responsibility for the historical misdeeds of ruling elites. If, however, any tyranny or venality, or aggressive war imposed by the State was brought about not by particular State rulers but by mysterious and arcane 'social forces,' or by the imperfect state of the world – or if, in some way, everyone was guilty É then there is no point in anyone's becoming indignant or rising up against such misdeeds. Furthermore, a discrediting of 'conspiracy theories' É will make the subjects more likely to believe the 'general welfare' reasons that are invariably put forth by the modern State for engaging in aggressive actions."
-- Murray Rothbard, For a New Liberty (New York: Macmillan, 1973), p. 62.
"... l'anarchisme véritable,
réalisable et réalisé, et non resté à l'état
de déclaration
sentimentale, c'est tout simplement l'économie libérale, avec tout
ce qu'elle entraîne:
démocratie
politique, liberté civile (et non simplement civique), culture libre, et
non subventionnée et dirigée. C'est l'économie libérale
qui, seule, peut favoriser le "dépérissement de l'État " et
de la politique – le
dépérissement ou du moins la limitation – ce n'est pas
le socialisme centralisateur."
... real anarchism, feasible and actual, as opposed to mere emotional
statements, is simply the [classical] liberal economy, and everything that goes
with it: political democracy, civil (and not only civic) liberty, free,
unsubsidized, unplanned culture. It is only the liberal economy that can favor
the "withering away of the state" and of politics – their
withering away or at least their limitation; centralized socialism cannot
achieve this.
-- Raymond Ruyer, ƒloge de la société de
consommation (Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1969), p. 267.
"I have emphasized that a difference between black-market crimes and most others, like racketeering and robbery, is that they are “crimes” only because we have legislated against the commodity they provide. We single out certain goods and services as harmful or sinful; for reasons of history and tradition, and for other reasons, we forbid dope but not tobacco, gambling in casinos but not on the stock-market, extra-marital sex but not gluttony, erotic stories but not mystery stories."
-- Thomas C. Schelling, “Economics and Criminal Enterprise”, Public Interest, Vol. 7 (1967), pp. 61-78; reproduced in Gianluca Fiorentini and Stefano Zamagni (Eds.), The Economics of Corruption and Illegal Markets, Vol. 3: The Economics of Illegal Markets and Organized Crime (Chenltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1999), p. 360.
"The aspiration to such
uniformity and order alerts us to the fact that modern statecraft is largely a
project of internal colonization, often glossed, as it is in its imperial
rhetoric, as a 'civilizing mission'."
-- James C. Scott, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the
Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven and
London: Yale University Press, 1998), p. 82.
Buy
Seeing Like a State at
Amazon.com.
Also
available in English at Amazon France.
"The tax upon shops, it was intended, should be the same upon all shops. It could not well have been otherwise. It would have been impossible to proportion with tolerable exactness the tax upon a shop to the extent of the trade carried on in it without such an inquisition as would have been altogether insupportable in a free country."
-- Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), Book V, Chap. 2 (New York: Random House, 1937, p. 804); also available at http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWNtoc.html (visited March 2, 2008)
"By pursuing his own
interest [every individual] frequently promotes that of the society more
effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I have never known much
good done by those who affected to trade for the public good."
-- Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of
Nations (1776), Book IV, Chap.
2 (New York: Random House, 1937, p. 423); also available at http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWNtoc.html
(visited March 2, 2008).
"But to ban guns because
criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights
and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty
and the lawless, and that the law will permit them to have only such rights and
liberties as the lawless will allow. ... For society does not control crime,
ever, by forcing the law-abiding to accommodate themselves to the expected
behavior of criminals. Society controls crime by forcing the criminals to
accommodate themselves to the expected behavior of the law-abiding."
-- Jeff Snyder, "Who's Under Assault in the 'Assault Weapon' Ban?", American
Rifleman, October 1994, p. 53; excerpted
from the Washington Times, August
25, 1994.
By this author, see Nation
of Cowards. Available at Amazon.com.
"A man is none the less a
slave because he is allowed to choose a new master once in a term of
years."
-- Lysander Spooner, The Constitution of No Authority (Boston: 1870), p. 28. Available on the Lysander
Spooner website at www.lysanderspooner.org.
Buy The
Lysander Spooner Reader at Amazon.com. Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"But this theory of our
government is wholly different from the practical fact. The fact is that the
government, like a highwayman, says to a man: 'Your money, or your life.' And
many, if not most, taxes are paid under the compulsion of that threat.
The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely place, spring upon
him from the roadside, and, holding a pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his
pockets. But the robbery is none the less a robbery on that account; and it is
far more dastardly and shameful.
The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility, danger, and
crime of his own act. He does not pretend that he has any rightful claim
to your
money, or that he intends to use it for your own benefit. He does not pretend
to be anything but a robber. He has not acquired impudence enough to profess
to be merely a 'protector,' and that he takes men's money against their will,
merely to enable him to 'protect' those infatuated travellers, who feel perfectly
able to protect themselves, or do not appreciate his peculiar system of
protection. He is too sensible a man to make such professions as these.
Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do.
He
does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming
to be your rightful 'sovereign,' on account of the 'protection' he affords
you. He
does not keep 'protecting' you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him;
by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you
of more
money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and
by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and
shooting
you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands.
He is too much of a gentleman to be guilty of such impostures, and insults,
and
villainies as these. In short, he does not, in addition to robbing you, attempt
to make you either his dupe or his slave."
-- Lysander Spooner, The Constitution of No Authority (Boston: 1870); available on the Lysander Spooner
website at www.lysanderspooner.org
(visited March 8, 2003). See French translation, within a
longer excerpt, on this site.
Buy The
Lysander Spooner Reader at Amazon.com. Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"And the men who loan money
to governments, so called, for the purpose of enabling the latter to rob,
enslave, and murder their people, are among the greatest villains that the world
has ever seen. And they as much deserve to be hunted and killed (if they cannot
otherwise be got rid of) as any slave traders, robbers, or pirates that ever
lived."
-- Lysander Spooner, The Constitution of No Authority (Boston: 1870); available on the Lysander Spooner
website at www.lysanderspooner.org
(visited October 23, 2003).
Buy The
Lysander Spooner Reader at Amazon.com. Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"The 'nations,' as they
are called, with whom our pretended ambassadors, secretaries, presidents,
and senators profess to make treaties, are as much myths as our own. On general
principles of law and reason, there are no such 'nations.' That is to say,
neither the whole people of England, for example, nor any open, avowed, responsible
body of men, calling themselves by that name, ever, by any open, written,
or other authentic contract with each other, formed themselves into any bona
fide, legitimate association or organization, or authorized any king, queen,
or other representative to make treaties in their name, or to bind them,
either individually, or as an association, by such treaties.
Our pretended
treaties, then, being made with no legitimate or bona fide nations, or representatives
of nations, and being made, on our part, by persons who have no legitimate
authority to act for us, have intrinsically no more validity than a pretended
treaty made by the Man in the Moon with the king of the Pleiades."
Les "nations", comme on dit, avec lesquelles nos prétendus ambassadeurs,
secrétaires, présidents et sénateurs affirment conclure des traités sont
des mythes autant que la nôtre. Selon les principes généraux du Droit et
de la raison, de telles "nations" n'existent pas. Autrement dit, ni le peuple
anglais tout entier, par exemple, ni aucun groupe d'hommes ouvert, reconnu,
responsable qui prendrait un tel nom, ne s'est jamais, par un contrat ouvert,
écrit, ou autrement authentifié qui les lierait les uns aux autres, constitué
en une association ou organisation viritable et légitime, ou n'a jamais autorisé
aucun roi, reine ou autre représentant à conclure des traités en son nom,
ou à le lier par ces traités, soit individuellement, soit en tant que groupe.
Donc, nos prétendus traités, puisqu'ils ne sont pas conclus avec des
nations (ou représentants de nations) légitimes et authentiques, traités
qui, de notre côté, sont conclus par des personnes qui n'ont aucune autorité
légitime pour agir en notre nom, ces traités, dis-je, n'ont intrinsèquement
pas plus de validité qu'un traité conclu par l'Homme de la Lune avec le roi
des Pléiades.
-- Lysander Spooner, The Constitution of No Authority (Boston: 1870); available on the Lysander Spooner
website at www.lysanderspooner.org
(visited March 8, 2003). French translation: Outrage à chefs d'État (Paris:
Belles Lettres, 1991), pp. 120-121.
Buy The
Lysander Spooner Reader at Amazon.com. Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"And the so-called
sovereigns, in these different governments, are simply the heads, or chiefs, of
different bands of robbers and murderers."
-- Lysander Spooner, The Constitution of No Authority (Boston: 1870); available on the Lysander Spooner
website at www.lysanderspooner.org
(visited March 8, 2003).
Buy The
Lysander Spooner Reader at Amazon.com. Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"I believe [William Graham
Sumner] was one of the greatest professor we ever had at Yale, but I have drawn
far away from his point of view, that of the old laissez faire doctrine. I
remember he said in his classroom: 'Gentlemen, the time is coming when there
will be two great classes, Socialists, and Anarchists. The Anarchists want the
government to be nothing, and the Socialists want government to be everything.
There can be no greater contrast. Well, the time will come when there will be
only these two great parties, the Anarchists representing the laissez faire
doctrine and the Socialists representing the extreme view on the other side,
and when that time comes I am an Anarchist.' That amused his class very much,
for he was as far from a revolutionary as you could expect."
-- Irving Fisher before the Yale Socialist Club in 1941, quoted in Mark
Thorton, The Economics of Prohibition
(University of Utah Press, 1991), p. 17. See below, in the
Anti-liberty section, for Fisher's comment.
" ... I suggest that the
more the state intervenes in such situations, the more 'necessary' (on this
view) it becomes, because positive altruism and voluntary cooperative behaviour
atrophy in the presence of the state and
grow in its absence. Thus, again,
the state exacerbates the conditions which are supposed to make it necessary.
We might say that the state is like an addictive drug: the more of it we have,
the more we 'need' it and the more we come to 'depend' on it."
-- Michael Taylor, The Possibility of Cooperation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), p.
168.
Buy
The Possibility of Cooperation at Amazon.com.
THE DAILY TELEGRAPH on the fight to reclaim our liberties"Today, The Daily
Telegraph starts its 'A Free Country' campaign. Week by week, and in major
individual investigations, we shall examine how freedom is being taken away,
whether by Westminster or Whitehall or Brussels or any other authority. We
shall try to annoy the control freaks, whether they are Right, Left or Centre,
and we shall welcome allies for freedom from all quarters. The Conservative
leadership contestants hardly breathe a word about freedom. The Labour
Government's Queen's Speech is a shopping list of attacks on our liberties.
There's plenty to do. Libertad o muerte!"
-- Daily Telegraph editorial, July 5, 2001; available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fopinion%2F2001%2F07%2F05%2Fdo01.xml
(visited November 7, 2003).
"Pour cette émancipation
à venir sont hors de course les idéologies visant à renforcer
l'État,
la police et les contrôles et à réduire la liberté."
For this future emancipation, we have to rule out ideologies that aim at
reinforcing the state, the police and controls in general, and at reducing
liberty.
-- André Thirion, ƒloge
de l'indocilité (Paris: Laffont, 1973), p. 326.
"Durant la traversée des
quartiers populaires, on voyait parfois un flic se glisser honteusement dans
son domicile, par une porte basse."
When you walked through working-class neighbourhoods, you would sometimes
see a cop slipping shamefacedly into his own house by a side door.
-- André Thirion, Le Grand Ordinaire
(Paris: ƒric Losfeld, 1970), p. 26.
Le
Grand Ordinaire en vente chez Amazon France.
"If I knew for a certainty
that a man was coming to my house with the conscious design to do me good, I
should run for my life..."
-- Henry David Thoreau, Walden, or Life in the Woods [1854], in Joseph
Wood Krutch (Ed.), Walden and Other Writings by Henry David Thoreau (New York:
Bantam Book, 1981), p. 160.
"I was put into jail as I
was going to the shoemaker's to get a shoe which was mended. When I was let out
the next morning, I proceeded to finish my errand, and, having put on my mended
shoe, joined a huckleberry party, who were impatient to put themselves under my
conduct; and in half an hour--for the horse was soon tackled--was in the midst
of a huckleberry field, on one of our highest hills, two miles off, and then
the State was nowhere to be seen."
On m'avait conduit en prison alors que je me rendais chez le cordonnier pour
y chercher une chaussure en réparation. Libéré le lendemain matin, j'allais
finir ma course et ayant enfilé ma chaussure ressemelée, je rejoignis un groupe
qui partait aux airelles, fort impatient de s'en re-mettre à ma direction ; une
demi-heure plus tard -- car le cheval fut bientôt harnaché -- je me trouvais en
plein champ d'airelles sur l'une de nos plus hautes collines, à plus de trois
kilomètres et de là, on ne voyait l'État nulle part.
-- Henry David Thoreau, A Duty of Civil Disobedience [1849], available at http://www.cs.indiana.edu/statecraft/civ.dis.html;
La Désobéissance civile,
translated by Micheline Flak (Montréal: La Presse, 1973), p. 95.
Buy
A Duty of Civil Disobedience at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"Under a government which
imprisons unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison."
-- Henry David Thoreau, A Duty of Civil Disobedience [1849], available at http://www.constitution.org/civ/civildis.htm (visited
November 27, 2007).
Buy
A Duty of Civil Disobedience at Amazon.com.
"Others -- as most
legislators, politicians, lawyers, ministers, and office-holders -- serve the
state chiefly with their heads; and, as they rarely make any moral distinctions,
they are as likely to serve the devil, without intending it, as God. A very few
-- as heroes, patriots, martyrs, reformers in the great sense, and men -- serve
the state with their consciences also, and so necessarily resist it for the
most part ..."
D'autres, comme la plupart des législateurs, des politiciens, des juristes,
des ministres et des fonctionnaires, servent surtout l'État avec leur intellect
et, comme ils font rarement des distinctions morales, il arrive que sans le
vouloir, ils servent le Démon aussi bien que Dieu. Une élite, les héros, les
patriotes, les martyrs, les réformateurs au sens noble du terme, et des hommes,
mettent aussi leur conscience au service de l'État et en viennent forcément,
pour la plupart, à lui résister.
-- Henry David Thoreau, A Duty of Civil Disobedience [1849], available at http://www.cs.indiana.edu/statecraft/civ.dis.html;
La Désobéissance civile,
translated by Micheline Flak (Montréal: La Presse, 1973), p. 60.
Buy
A Duty of Civil Disobedience at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
Henry David THOREAU on the best government
"I heartily accept the
motto, 'That government is best which governs least'; and I should like to see
it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts
to this, which also I believe -- 'That government is best which governs not at
all'; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government
which the will have."
-- Henry David Thoreau, A Duty of Civil Disobedience [1849], available at http://www.cs.indiana.edu/statecraft/civ.dis.html
(visited October 14, 2003).
Buy
A Duty of Civil Disobedience at Amazon.com.
Traduction
française en vente chez Amazon France.
"The new puritans have been
highly successful. All of the preconditions for new prohibitions on alcohol and
tobacco are in place. ... Indeed, the future agenda of the federal government
has already been established to outlaw alcohol and tobacco in the near future.
... If current trends persist, America will be moving toward stricter
prohibitions, greater restrictions, and more centralized control over
consumption. This represents an erosion of liberty at its most fundamental
level."
-- Mark Thornton, Mark, "The Fall and Rise of Puritanical Policy in
America", Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1 (Spring
1996), p. 159.
"It does not seem to me as if I were living in the country in which I was born, or in which I received whatever I got of political education and principles."
-- Quoted in Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, Emancipating Slaves, Enslaving Free Men (Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 1996), p. 333.
"The misapprehension springs
from the fact that the learned jurists, deceiving themselves as well as others,
depict in their books an ideal of government -- not as it really is, an
assembly of men who oppress their fellow-citizens, but in accordance with the
scientific postulate, as a body of men who act as the representatives of the
rest of the nation. They have gone on repeating this to others so long that
they have ended by believing it themselves, and they really seem to think that
justice is one of the duties of governments. History, however, shows us that
governments, as seen from the reign of Caesar to those of the two Napoleons and
Prince Bismarck, are in their very essence a violation of justice; a man or a
body of men having at command an army of trained soldiers, deluded creatures
who are ready for any violence, and through whose agency they govern the State,
will have no keen sense of the obligation of justice. Therefore governments
will never consent to diminish the number of those well-trained and submissive
servants, who constitute their power and influence."
-- Tolstoy, Writings on Civil Disobedience and Non-Violence (Signet Books, 1968), pp. 238-239.
"No man's life, liberty or
property are safe while the legislature is in session."
-- Quoted by Judge Gideon J. Tucker, New York, c. 1866, as reported in David
Friedman, The Machinery of Freedom (La
Salle: Open Court, 1989), p. 146.
"Characteristically,
however, the overthrow of the dictator simply means that there will be another dictator.
... the policies they follow will probably not be radically different. If we
look around the world, we quickly realize that these policies will not be
radically different from those that would be followed by a democracy
either."
-- Gordon Tullock, Autocracy (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers,
1987), p. 20.
"If the major opportunities
for future growth of government lie in the area of conventional taxation, are
there any defenses available to the citizenry? ... Perhaps the most fruitful
advice comes in two parts. The first piece of advice is to avoid war and the
rumor of war: this is history greatest boon to the tax man. ... The second
piece of advice is to seek ways of inhibiting government's ability conveniently
to increase its collections. Possibly the very increase in that ability that is
in prospect can be turned to account by a constitutional provision which
forbade the income tax, and perhaps even the storage of information regarding
individual incomes by third parties, including government."
-- Benjamin Ward, "Taxes and the Size of Government," American
Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings,
Vol. 72, No. 2 (May 1982), p. 350.
"Is that a gun in your
pocket, or are you just happy to see me?"
C'est un revolver que vous avez dans votre poche, ou vous êtes tout
simplement ravi de me voir?
-- Mae West in her movie Sextette, quoted at http://www.sirius.com/~kims/mwfaq.html
(visited October 15, 2001).
"The form of government that
is most suitable to the artist is no government at all. ... One might point out
how the Renaissance was great, because it sought to solve no social problem,
and busied itself not about such things, but suffered the individual to develop
freely, beautifully, and naturally, and so had great and individual artists,
and great, individual men. One might point out how Louis XIV, by creating the
modern state, destroyed the individualism of the artist ..."
-- Oscar Wilde, "The Soul of Man Under Socialism", in Oscar
Wilde's Plays, Writings and Poems (J.M.
Dent, 1930), pp. 281 and 283.
Buy
"The Soul of Man Under Socialism" at Amazon.com.
"There is little to be
feared from the standard picture of a totalitarian society in which 'cogs,' who
are watched by Big Brother or his equivalent, carry out orders emanating from
the top. Such a society would collapse in inefficiency. What is infinitely more
fearsome is the capacity of a dictatorship to use the principle of competition
to organize terror and murder."
-- Ronald Wintrobe, The Political Economy of Dictatorship (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 328.
"No slaves shall keep any
arms whatever, nor pass, unless with written orders from his master or
employer, or in his company, with arms from one place to another."
-- A Bill Concerning Slaves [1785], reproduced in Alfred Fried, Ed., The
Essential Jefferson (Collier Books, 1963),
p. 140.
[ALSO AVAILABLE IN A JPEG POSTER
FORMAT]
"Jena by this time was a
center of antitobacco activism -- mainly through the labors of Karl Astel,
director of the new institute [Institute for Tobacco Hazards Research] and
president, since the summer of 1939, of the University of Jena. Astel was head
of the Thuringia's office of Racial Affairs and a notorious antisemite and
racial hygienist (he had joined the Nazi party and the SS in July of 1930) ...
Astel was also a militant antismoker and teetolater who once characterized
opposition to tobacco as a 'national socialist duty.' On May 1, 1941, he banned
smoking in all buildings and classrooms of the University of Jena, and the
following spring, as head of Thuringia's Public Health Office, he announced a
smoking ban in all regional schools and health offices. Tobacco in his view had
to be fought 'cigar by cigar, cigarette by cigarette, and pack by pack' --
hence his notoriety for snatching cigarettes from the mouth of students who
dared to violate his Jena University tobacco ban."
Robert N. Proctor, The Nazi War on Cancer
(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), p.209.
BIG BROTHER's voice in THX 1138"Blessings of the state,
blessings of the masses. ... Work hard, increase production, prevent accidents,
and be happy."
Bénédiction de l'État, bénédiction des masses.
[...] Travaille dur, accrois la production, évite les accidents, et sois
heureux.
-- George Lucas's movie THX 1138.
Buy
THX 1138 (VHS) at Amazon.com.
"That the state should
assist its needy citizens to a greater degree than before is not only a
Christian and humanitarian duty, of which the state apparatus should be fully
conscious: it is also a task to be undertaken for the preservation of the state
itself. The goal of this task is to nurture among the unpropertied classes of
the population, which are the most numerous as well as least informed, the view
that the state is not only a necessary but also a beneficent institution."
-- Quote attributed to Bismark as it figured in the ÒMotiveÓ accompanying
one of his 1883 Welfare-State law proposals; quoted in Ron Hamowy, "The Genesis
and
Development of Medicare," in Roger D. Feldman (Ed.), American
Health Care: Government, Market Processes, and the Public Interest (Oakland:
The Independent Institute, 2001), p. 54.
"'My friends, if it was
wrong of you to kill and eat your fellow-men, it is wrong also to kill and eat
fish, flesh, and fowl. Birds, beasts, and fishes, have as full a right to live
as long as they can unmolested by man, as man has to live unmolested by his
neighbours. ...'
The old prophet had allowed the use of eggs and milk, but his disciples decided
that to eat a fresh egg was to destroy a potential chicken, and that this came
to much the same as murdering a live one. ...
About six or seven hundred years, however, after the death of the old prophet,
a philosopher appeared ... The conclusion he drew, or pretended to draw, was that
if it was sinful to kill and eat animals, it was not less sinful to do the like
by vegetables, or their seeds.
... after several hundred years of wandering in the wilderness of philosophy,
the country reached the conclusions that common sense had long since arrived
at. Even the Puritans after a vain attempt to subsist on a kind of jam made of
apples and yellow cabbage leaves, succumbed to the inevitable, and resigned
themselves to a diet of roast beef and mutton, with all the usual adjuncts of a
modern dinner-table."
-- Samuel Butler, Erewhon or Over the Range, 1901, Chap. 27, passim,
available at http://www.planetpdf.com/ebookarticle.asp?ContentID=6137.
"It would not be
unreasonable, by analogy with a motor vehicle licence, that a permit to
reproduce should also be needed with a minimum age of, for example,
twenty-five, and a proof required that the parents are of sufficient maturity
and financial resource to take proper care of the child. Young, sexually
active, but emotionally immature teenagers would need help."
-- Sir Roy Calne, Too Many People
(London and New York: Calder Publications and Riverrun Press, 1994), p.113.
"After listening to the
recordings containing the remarks made by on-air personalities on 10 and 27
September and 8 October and reading the stenographic notes, the Commission
identified several remarks about the complainant related to her physical
attributes, and sexual attributes in particular. There are multiple references
to the size of her breasts; [translation] Òher incredible set of boobsÓ ... The
Commission considers that the remarks made about Ms. Chiasson were abusive and
tended to expose her, and women in general, to contempt on the basis of sex, in
contravention of section 3(b) of the Regulations. Further, the remarks do not
meet the objectives of the broadcasting policy for Canada set out in the Act.
The remarks did not meet the objective of high standard of programming required
by section 3(1)(g) of the Act."
-- Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Broadcasting
Decision CRTC 2004-271, Ottawa, July 13, 2004, par. 61 and 65; available
at http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2004/db2004-271.pdf
(visited August 15, 2004).
"The regulation prohibiting
abusive comment that tends or is likely to expose a person or a group to hatred
or contempt is necessary not only to avoid harm to the persons targeted, but
also to ensure that Canadian values are respected for all Canadians. The
broadcast of remarks that could expose individuals or groups to hatred or
contempt can attract individuals to its cause and in the process create serious
discord between various groups in Canadian society to the detriment of all of
Canadian society. This harm undermines the cultural, political and social
fabric of Canada which the Canadian broadcasting system is expressly meant to
safeguard, enrich and strengthen. It also undermines the multicultural and
multiracial nature of Canadian society, which the programming of the Canadian
broadcasting system should reflect. Protection from the harms of abusive
comment is for the benefit of all Canadians."
-- Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, Broadcasting
Decision CRTC 2004-271, Ottawa, July 13, 2004, par. 35; available at http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2004/db2004-271.pdf
(visited August 15, 2004).
"Je prétends revendiquer
pour la nation une éducation qui ne dépende que de l'État parce
que des enfants de l'État doivent être élevéés par des
membres de l'État."
I claim for the nation an education that depends only on the State, because
children of the State must be raised by members of the State.
-- Louis-René de Caradeuc de La Chalotais, Essai d'éducation
nationale et plan d'étude pour la jeunesse
[1763] (Paris: Raynal, 1825), p. 15.
"Ohe day after Wei Xin and
I slept together the first time, my ever-sensible mother went down and applied
for a birth quota for us from the street committee."
-- Steven W. Mosher, A MotherÕs Ordeal: One WomanÕs fight Against ChinaÕs
One-child Policy ( New York: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1993), p. 168.
"Article 1. These
Regulations are formulated in order to prove the identity of residents,
facilitate citizens' social activities, maintain public order and guarantee
citizens lawful rights and interests. ...
Article 13. When performing its duties, the public security organ shall have
the power to examine a citizen's resident identity card, and the citizen shall
not refuse to be examined."
-- Regulations of the PRC [People's Republic of China] Concerning Resident
Identity Cards (1985), reproduced in People's Daily Online, at http://english.people.com.cn/data/laws/detail.php?id=140.
"Arms in the hands of Jews are a danger to public safety."
-- Quoted by Stephen P. Halbrook, "'Arms in the Hands of Jews Are a Danger to Public Safety': Nazism, Firearm Registration, and the Night of the Broken Glass," in St. Thomas Law Review, Vol. 21 (2009), p. 117; fac simile available at http://stephenhalbrook.com/law_review_articles/Halbrook_macro_final_3_29.pdf.
"Jim Creechan, a University
of Alberta sociologist, said some of the love of guns may have its roots in
Alberta's pervasive free-enterprise model of behaviour. 'It's the whole idea
that the individual is more important than the collective.'"
-- Alanna Mitchell, "Canada's Copycat Killing: Gun ownership in Alberta
approaches U.S. levels", Globe and Mail, April 30, 1999, p. A-1.
"After fifty years as a
Prohibitionist, I am more convinced than ever that we need a good party, not
just good men and good women. Most public officials are united in the war against
terrorism. They, like we, are outraged at the deaths of some 3,000 Americans on
September 11. Yet, most are willing to give unqualified support to the traffic
in liquor and tobacco in exchange for campaign cash. Those products jointly
claim at least 600,000 American lives each year. Two hundred die each year from
use of alcohol and tobacco for every one who died in the September 11 attacks.
Need another reason for being a Prohibitionist?"
-- David P. Dodge, The National Statesman, September 2002, p. 3;
available at http://www.prohibition.org/statesman-200208.pdf
(visited July 16, 2003).
"Le positivisme n'admet
jamais que des devoirs, chez tous envers tous. Car son point de vue toujours
social ne peut comporter aucune notion de droit, constamment fondée sur
l'individualité. Nous naissons chargés d'obligations de toute espèce,
envers nos prédécesseurs, nos successeurs, et nos contemporains. Elles
ne font ensuite que se développer ou s'accumuler avant que nous puissions
rendre aucun service. [...] Tout droit humain est donc absurde autant qu'immoral.
Puisqu'il n'existe
plus de droits divins, cette notion doit donc s'effacer complètement, comme
purement relative au régime préliminaire, et directement incompatible
avec l'état final, qui n'admet que des devoirs, d'après des fonctions."
Social positivism only accepts duties, for all and towards all. Its constant
social viewpoint cannot include any notion of rights, for such notion always
rests on individuality. We are born under a load of obligations of every kind,
to our predecessors, to our successors, to our contemporaries. These
obligations then increase or accumulate, for it is some time before we can
return any service. ... Any human right is therefore as absurd as immoral.
Since there no divine rights anymore, this concept must therefore disappear
completely as related only to the preliminary regime and totally inconsistent
with the final state where there are only duties based on functions.
-- Auguste Comte, Le catéchisme positiviste (1852), reproduit in Alain Laurent, L'Individu et ses ennemis (Paris: Hachette, 1987), pp. 255-256.
"Celui qui conspue les
drapeaux d'un État se déconsidère aux yeux de tout citoyen
civilisé et
agit contre les lois. Mais celui qui conspue le drapeau rouge ... s'exclut
lui-même
de la communauté de tous les honnêtes gens."
Anyone who decries a State flag belittles himself before all
civilized citizens, and commits an unlawful act. But one who decries the red
flag ... thereby excludes himself from the community of all honest people."
-- Resolution of the Czechoslovakian Communist Party, April 1969, quoted
by Jacques Ellul, Autopsie de la Révolution (Paris: Calman-Lévy, 1969), p. 239
"I believe [that William
Graham Sumner] was one of the greatest professor we ever had at Yale, but I
have drawn far away from his point of view, that of the old laissez faire
doctrine. I remember he said in his classroom: 'Gentlemen, the time is coming
when there will be two great classes, Socialists, and Anarchists. The
Anarchists want the government to be nothing, and the Socialists want
government to be everything. There can be no greater contrast. Well, the time
will come when there will be only these two great parties, the Anarchists representing
the laissez faire doctrine and the Socialists representing the extreme view on
the other side, and when that time comes I am an Anarchist.' That amused his
class very much, for he was as far from a revolutionary as you could expect.
But I would like to say that if that time comes when there are two great
parties, Anarchists and Socialists, then I am a Socialist. "
-- Irving Fisher before the Yale Socialist Club in 1941, quoted in Mark
Thorton, The Economics of Prohibition
(University of Utah Press, 1991), p. 17
"One method of overcoming
the difficult informational requirements of the allocation models described
above is by enacting a requirement that anyone wanting to purchase cigarettes
must first purchase a 'cigarette card'. The card, which could be based on the
same magnetic strip (or computer chip) technology used for credit cards and ATM
cards, would be issued to any legal-aged smoker who wanted to buy cigarettes
and would have to be presented by the smoker each time she purchased
cigarettes. [É] A reaction of many readers may well be that our proposal gives
too much information to government agencies, therefore creating a 'Big Brother'
problem. We sympathize with that concern, but we believe the problem is not as
significant as it may appear initially. First, it is not clear that the sort of
information that the cigarette card system would generate is any different from
the sort of information that the American public routinely provides to
government and private agencies. In other words, it may be too late to worry
about the sort of privacy concern that this proposal raises."
-- Jon D. Hanson and Kyle D. Logue, "The Costs of Cigarettes: The Economic
Case for Ex Post Incentive-Based Regulation", Yale Law Journal, Vol. 107, No. 8 (March 1998), pp. 1292 and 1294.
"The authority of local
government was similarly attacked. The not inconsiderable power of the LŠnder disappeared as a result of the decree of 28 February
[1933] and the manipulated elections which followed. Control of the police
passed into the hands of the NSDAP. ... Local elections were abolished and
Reich Administrators ... were appointed to rule in place of the locally elected
heads of government. On 30 January 1934 all local assemblies were abolished,
and states were made totally subservient to central rule."
-- Paul Hayes, "The Triumph of Caesarism," in Paul Hayes (Ed.), Themes
in Modern European History 1890-1945
(London and New York: Routledge, 1992), p. 191.
"The most foolish mistake we
could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms.
History shows that all conquerors who have allowed the subject races to carry
arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as
to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the
overthrow of any sovereignty."
-- Adolf Hitler, Hitler's Table Talks 1941-1944, Edited by H.R. Trevor-Roper (London: Widenfeld and Nicolson, 1953),
pp. 425-426.
Adolf
HITLER on nationalization"Why nationalize industry
when you can nationalize the people?"
-- Adolf Hitler, quoted in Robert N. Proctor, The Nazi War on Cancer (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), p.
74.
Buy
The Nazi War on Cancer at Amazon.com.
[See also Pierre Lemieux's review of Proctor's book in The
Independent Review, reproduced on this site.]
"I made the acquaintance in
Bayreuth of a business man ... There was a notice on his door: 'Smokers not
admitted.' For my part, I have no notice on my door, but smokers are not
admitted."
-- Adolf Hitler, Hitler's Table Talks 1941-1944, Edited by H.R. Trevor-Roper (London: Widenfeld and Nicolson, 1953),
pp. 360-361.
Heinrich
HOFFMANN on Hitler's simple lifestyle"Adolph Hitler's life style
is simple. He never drinks alcohol and does not smoke."
-- Heinrich Hoffmann, Hitler wie ihn keiner kennt (Berlin: "Zeitgeschichte" Verlag, 1932), quoted at www.calvin.edu/cas/gpa/hitler2.htm.
[Click the image to download a printable poster with the caption.]
"Nobody should claim that
the war is over. But certainly it can be said that the regime is
finished."
-- John Howard, Prime Minister of Australia, quoted by Peter Shawn Taylor in The
National Post, April 12, 2003, p. A-18.
"Southerners did not stop
with an open defense of slavery. They went on to attack northern society for
its 'wage slavery' and 'exploitation of workers,' using arguments repeated by
socialist critics of capitalism. The southern writer who developed these arguments
most extensively was George Fitzhugh, a Virginia planter and lawyer. His two
books were provocatively entitled Sociology for the South: Or the Failure of
the Free Society and Cannibals
All! Or Slaves Without Masters. In them,
Fitzhugh defended slavery as a practical form of socialism that provided
contented slaves with paternalistic masters, thereby eliminating harsh
conflicts between employers and allegedly free workers. 'A Southern farm is the
beau ideal of Communism; it is a joint concern, in which the slave ... is far
happier, because ... he is always sure of support.' ...
'The best governed countries, and which have prospered the most, have always
been distinguished for the number and stringency of their laws,' he wrote;
'liberty is an evil which government is intended to correct.'"
-- Jeffrey Rogers Hummel, Emancipating the Slaves, Enslaving Free
Men: A History of the American Civil War
(Chicago: Open Court, 1996), p. 23.
Buy
Emancipating the Slaves, Enslaving Free Men: A History of the American Civil
War at Amazon.com.
Also
available in English at Amazon France.
"It would upset the whole social order if men started doing things on their own."
-- Aldous Huxley, Brave New World [1932] (Toronto: Vintage Canada, 2007), p. 209.
"[Herbert Hoover] hailed the Federal Reserve System as the great instrument of promoting stability, and called for an 'ample supply of credit at low rates of interest,' as well as public works, as the best methods of ending the depression."
-- Murray N. Rothbard on a speech of President Hoover in 1930, at the beginning of the Great Depression, in America's Great Depression (Sheed and Ward: 1963), p. 217.
"The advantage of national
planning is its ability to remove the wastes of oligopolistic anarchy, i.e.
meaningless product differentiation and an imbalance between different
industries within a geographical area. It concentrates all levels of decision
making in one locale and thus provide each region with a full complement of
skills and occupations. This opens up new horizons of local development by
making possible the social and political control of economic decision-making.
Multinational corporations, in contrast, weaken political control because they
span many countries and can escape national regulation."
-- Stephen Hymer, "The Multinational Corporation and the Law of Uneven
Development", in J. Bhagwati (Ed.), Economics and World Order from the
1970s to the 1990s (Collier-Macmillan,
1972); reprinted in in H. Radice (Ed.), International Firms and
Modern Imperialism (Penguin, 1975), p. 52.
"If the Treasury were to
fill old bottles with bank-notes, bury them at suitable depths in disused
coal-mines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave
it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the
notes up again (the right to do so being obtained, of course, by tendering for
leases of the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and,
with the help of repercussions, the real income of the community, and its
capital wealth, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually
is."
-- John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (London: Macmillan, 1936), p. 129.
"Consequently, any activity
that is potentially harmful to others and requires certain demonstrated
competence for its safe performance, is subject to regulation that is, it is
theoretically desirable that we regulate it. ... If fact, I dare say that
parenting is a paradigm of such activities since the potential for harm is
great (both in the extent of harm any one person can suffer and in the number
of people potentially harmed) and the need for competence is so evident.
Consequently, there is good reason to believe that parents should be licensed."
-- Hugh LaFollette, "Licensing Parents", Philosophy and Public
Affairs, Winter 1980, reproduced at http://www.etsu-tn.edu/philos/faculty/hugh/lic-par.htm.
"Fascist intellectuals, such
as Ugo Spirito, made the round of conferences preaching the virtues of
postcapitalism fascism and in fact tried to nudge the structure in a
'leftist' direction by calling for more collective control and even corporative
ownership of the economy. Mussolini looked abroad to find that Franklin
Roosevelt was merely seeking to emulate Italy's innovations."
-- Charles S. Maier, In Search of Stability: Explorations in Historical
Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1987), p. 81.
"If any man has a mind to visit his friends that live in some other town, or desires to travel and see the rest of the country, he obtains leave very easily from the syphogrant and tranibors when there is no particular occasion for him at home: such as travel, carry with them a passport from the Prince, which both certifies the license that is granted for travelling, and limits the time of their return. ... but if any man goes out of the city to which he belongs, without leave, and is found rambling without a passport, he is severely treated, he is punished as a fugitive, and sent home disgracefully; and if he falls again into the like fault, is condemned to slavery."
-- Thomas More, Utopia (1516), reproduced at http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/thomasmore-utopia.html.
"Against individualism, the
Fascist conception is for the State ... Liberalism denied the State in the
interests of the particular individual; Fascism reaffirms the State as the true
reality of the individual."
-- Benito Mussolini, "Fascism," Italian Encyclopaedia, 1932, reproduced in Michael J. Oakeshott, The
Social and Political Doctrines of Contemporary Europe (Cambridge University Press, 1939), at http://198.114.210.72/facmats/cooper/readings/mussolini.htm.
"Given that the nineteenth
century was the century of Socialism, of Liberalism, and of Democracy, it does
not necessarily follow that the twentieth century must also be a century of
Socialism, Liberalism and Democracy: political doctrines pass, but humanity
remains, and it may rather be expected that this will be a century of authority
... a century of Fascism. For if the nineteenth century was a century of
individualism it may be expected that this will be the century of collectivism
and hence the century of the State."
-- Benito Mussolini, "Fascism," Italian Encyclopaedia, 1932, reproduced at http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/mussolini-fascism.html.
"We were the first to assert that the more complicated the forms assumed by civilization, the more restricted the freedom of the individual must become."
-- Quoted by Friedrich Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007 -- original edition: 1944), p. 91.
"The measures adopted to
restore public order are: First of all, the elimination of the so-called
subversive elements. [...] They were elements of disorder and subversion. On
the morrow of each conflict I gave the categorical order to confiscate the
largest possible number of weapons of every sort and kind. This confiscation, which
continues with the utmost energy, has given satisfactory results."
-- Speech delivered by Prime Minister Benito Mussolini before the Italian
Senate, June 8, 1923. Reproduced in Mussolini as Revealed in His Political
Speeches (London & Toronto: J.M. Dent
& Sons Ltd., 1923), pp. 308-309.
"The Government has been
compelled to levy taxes which unavoidably hit large sections of the population.
The Italian people are disciplined, silent and calm, they work and know that
there is a Government which governs, and know, above all, that if this
Government hits cruelly certain sections of the Italian people, it does not so
out of caprice, but from the supreme necessity of national order."
-- Speech delivered by Prime Minister Benito Mussolini before the Italian
Senate, June 8, 1923. Reproduced in Mussolini as Revealed in His Political
Speeches (London & Toronto: J.M. Dent
& Sons Ltd., 1923), pp. 317-318.
"One topic that has only
recently begun to attract attention is the Nazi anti-tobacco movement. Germany
had the world's strongest antismoking movement in the 1930s and early 1940s,
supported by Nazi medical and military leaders worried that tobacco might prove
a hazard to the race. Many Nazi leaders were vocal opponents of smoking.
Anti-tobacco activists pointed out that whereas Churchill, Stalin, and
Roosevelt were all fond of tobacco, the three major fascist leaders of Europe
-- Hitler, Mussolini, and Franco -- were all non-smokers."
-- Robert N. Proctor, "The Anti-tobacco Campaign of the Nazis: A Little
Known Aspect of Public Health in Germany, 1933-45", BMJ, Vol. 313 (1996), pp. 1450-1453, available at http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/313/7070/1450.
"Die deutsche Frau raucht
nicht!"
"The German woman does not smoke!"
-- Nazi slogan quoted in Robert N. Proctor, The Nazi War on Cancer (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), p.
218.
[ALSO AVAILABLE IN A JPG POSTER FORMAT, IN EITHER ENGLISH OR FRENCH. See also my review of
Proctor's book in The Independent Review, reproduced on this
site.]
Buy
The Nazi War on Cancer at Amazon.com.
"Another defining feature of
therapeutic ethos, then, is the growing tendency to define a range of human
behaviors as diseases or pathologies."
-- James L. Nolan, The Therapeutic State: Justifying Government at Century's
End (New York: New York University Press,
1998), p. 9.
Buy
The Therapeutic State: Justifying Government at Century's End at
Amazon.com.
Also
available in English at Amazon France.
"I think the American people right now are feeling frustrated that there's not a lot of adult supervision out there."
-- Barak Obama quoted in National Post, December 18, 2008, at http://www.nationalpost.com/news/world/story.html?id=1091578.
"I hate purity. I hate goodness! I don't want any virtue to exist anywhere. I want everyone to be corrupt to the bones."
-- Winston Smith in George Orwell [1949], Nineteen Eighty-Four (London: Penguin, 1987), p. 132.
"Smoking is not a pleasure. We hope people don't take this as a prohibition; we are just trying to help them."
-- Erick Rodriguez, Hugo Chavez's Health minister, quoted by Bloomberg News, National Post, May 16, 2007, p. FP6.
"Early in 1979, I and
several other young nurses from my ward were summoned to a mass meeting. … All
sixty-odd of us were young married women who had not yet been sterilized. …
Secretary Wang arrived and took up a position in front of the assembly. His
round little face, normally the picture of conviviality, was set in an
expression of the utmost gravity. 'Today we have a matter of extreme urgency,'
he began, 'a toudeng dashi, to discuss.
It concerns the population of the motherland. The People's Republic of China
has within its borders nearly a billion people, or one-fifth of the world's
population. This is a big burden for the people's government. ... Having
children is not a question that we can afford to let each family, each
household, decide for itself. ... It is a question that should be decided at
the national level. China is a socialist country. This means that the interests
of the individual must be subordinated to the interests of the state. Where
there is conflict between the interests of the state in reducing population and
the interests of the individual in having children, it must be resolved in
favor of the state.'
-- Chi An, quoted in Steven W. Mosher, A Mother's Ordeal: One Woman's
fight Against China's One-child Policy (
New York: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1993), p. 212-213.
"I have been reading a
German book. We must draft a decree at once... Communal physical exercises. ...
This is very important. The health of the nation depends on it."
The Emperor of Azania, in Evelyn Waugh, Black Mischief (London: Pinguin, 1932), p. 142.
"Let no Negroe or mulattoe
be cabable of taking, holding, or exercising any public office, freehold,
franchise or privilege. ... Nor of keeping, or bearing arms, unless authorized
to do by some act of the general assembly, whose duration shall be limited to
three years."
-- St. George Tucker (Ed.) in Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of
England (1803, p. 144), quoted in Stephen
P. Halbrook, That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a
Constitutional Right (Albuquerque:
University of New Mexico Press, 1984), p. 100.
Buy
That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right at
Amazon.com.
"From that point on, the
extraordinary system of spies and informers which has played an important part
in the political work of the French state into our own time took shape.
(Sartine, who became lieutenant general de police in 1759, is supposed to have said to Louis XV, "Sire, when three
people are chatting in the street one of them is surely my man.")
Eighteenth-century police manuals like those of Colquhoun in England or Lemaire
in France are no less than general treatises on the government's full
repertoire of domestic regulation, coercion, and surveillance."
-- Charles Tilly, The Formation of National States in Western Europe (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975), p.60.
"It's possible that aggregate demand shortgage -- the social disorganization of unnessary poverty in the midst of potential plenty in the Great Depression -- is no longer a high priority because macroeconomics solved it, not because it never was a problem and the macro theory and policy it evoked was wrong."
-- Interview with James Tobin in Brian Snowdon and Howard R. Vane, Modern Macroeconomics. Its Origins, Development and Current State (Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2005).
"The denial or revocation of
a parenting license would be expected to be a painful experience, particularly
for mothers. … The overall importance of protecting innocent children from
incompetent parenting justifies the inconvenience to a few parents and the
inevitable imperfections of a licensing system."
-- Jack C. Westman, Licensing Parents: Can We Prevent Child Abuse and
Neglect? (New York and London: Plenum
Press, 1994), p. 243.
"Freiheit (freedom or liberty) was another victim of semanticide. Liberalism from Thomas Hobbes onward has tended to define freedom as the absence of restraints upon the individual. Nazism defined it as the absence of restraints upon the state. 'There is no freedom of the individual,' Dietrich [Hitler's press secretary] declared. 'There is only freeedom of peoples, nations or races.'"
--John Wesley Young, Orwell's Newspeak and Totalitarian Language. Its Nazi and Communist Antecedents(Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1991), p. 106.